Heading For Healing 3: RIDING THE RESOURCES

I am heading for healing because people believe when they see a miracle. I WATCHED my left arm grow out a fraction of an inch when Charles Hunter (of Charles and Francis, the "Happy Hunters") prayed for dozens of people in an auditorium. He asked Jesus to make the correct length everyone's limbs. Some legs grew out four inches. My arm grew out about a half inch. I watched it as it grew out, evidencing His presence and power and awareness of me. The baptism in the Holy Spirit could be a chakra opening, hearing Jesus' voice could be my imagination, but that arm growing out -- my own personal arm -- I WATCHED IT! No spiritual tom-foolery, delusion, or hallucination there.

So you want a miracle healing. 101 Of GOD's Healing Promises To Declare Every Morning - Kenneth Copeland reads "God's Will To Heal" -- a list of scriptures revealing God’s attitude towards healing (look for Keith Moore’s free e-book in the drop-down under the video). See also Sid Roth Healing Scriptures
Healing Scriptures

God wants to heal us as a sign to instill faith in others, because fixing us (Him) is the whole purpose of the world. We are HIS crooked, misgrown, too-short limbs. What God says through healing evangelists like T.L. Osborn to people in need of healing he says to everyone of us. LISTEN. Listen to T. L. below and be healed with them.

TL Osborn - The Nakuru Crusade 4,017 views•Sep 15, 2014.

Four thousand and seventeen views in five years. How hungry for healing are people in need of healing? U2’s song, “Where the Streets Have No Name” has over 60 million views. If you need healing, be a listener. Surrender yourself and submit to God without reservation. You cannot give yourself to God, because he already OWNS all of us. We all are in his one, the "one" that God is. We are in his Manifestation, the Milta. But we are crooked by ignorance. He wants us straightened out by wisdom (and he is going to do it).

DocuMiracle -Black Gold | Osborn Ministries International

Miracle Stories That Stir Your Faith | Osborn Ministries International

A Miracle Wind Blows In Kikwit-Chaos Of Miracles | Osborn Ministries International

Keith Moore Gods will to heal Pt 1 How to find the will of God

TL Osborn - Receive Miracle Healing audio book

01 Healing The Sick TL Osborn

Charles and Frances Hunter 02 Healing Lakeland

Heading For Healing 2: Back to Focus on How to Think and Jethro, the Excellence of God

The Milta, Who is the Manifestation of all of the infinite and eternal and incomprehensible Ineffable God, says, "I am that 'I AM,' the 'I AM' who heals you."

Say it: "I AM." What do you want to be? What do you need to be? When you say it again, see that as what you are: "I AM (THAT)."

We manifest what our inner consciousness believes we are. That is what God thinks we are. We think, "I am this." And God makes us as we believe. Change the "I AM" to what you want. Heal yourself in your mind. The Milta, the Life-giver (Eashoa, Jesus), will give life to what you believe. What He thinks we are, we are. Put your hand, which is His hand, on yourself and say, "I AM HEALED IN JESUS' NAME." Think you are what you want to be, and say, "Thank You."

Heading For Healing 1: From Victor Alexander: How Jesus the Milta is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit in Mark 12:36; 16:19 Sitting at the Right - Jesus is Me

From Victor Alexander's translation from the ancient Aramaic of Mark 12:36:

36.* "For David said through the holy Spirit that, 'The Lord said to my Lord, Sit from my right,* until I make your enemies the rug under your feet.'"

Victor's notes:
*12:36.1 In this passage, Jesus explains how he is the Father and the Son and the holy Spirit.
*12:36.2 Lit. Ar. idiomatic expression retained: "Manifest the Power," or "Become My Manifestation."

My ciphering of what Vic means:
A) David is the human focus of Consciousness
B) It is God's Consciousness - the Holy Spirit - speaking by David
C) Jesus, the Milta, the "Son" of the Ineffable, was told by the Ineffable to sit from Its right, which means:
D) Be My Manifestation

In Mark 16:19:

19. "Jesus then the Lord, after he spoke with them, went up to heaven, and sat from the right of God.

Jesus, the Milta of the Ineffable, is our substitute and is the Manifestation of the Ineffable, Who are we by extension. By faith in Him, we are JOINED WITH HIM. I.e., we are as He is.

My take on Alexander's note in Story of Jesus From His Own Words, page 147: "He sits at the right of the Father" means He is the right arm - the power - of God. And thus so are we the right arm of God. "To whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed?" Go look in the mirror.

Mark 16:19 in context:
15. And he told them, "Go to all people and preach my faith in all creation.
16. "Whoever believes and declares it, shall Live, and whoever does not believe, will be held accountable.
17. "Signs then to those that believe, they who adhere to us, in my name, they will cast out demons, and they will speak in new languages* (tongues),
18. "And they will handle snakes* (take up snakes, or deal with evil people), and if deadly poison they drink* (if they drink poison of death, or whatever happens to them), it will not affect them. And they will consecrate their hands on the sick and they will be restored."
19. Jesus then the Lord, after he spoke with them, went up to heaven, and sat from the right of God.
20. They then went out, and preached every place, and the Lord helped them and began filling them with signs that they performed.

Mark 12:36 again: "Sit from my right (you be my right arm), until I make your enemies the rug under your feet." I think the Arm is supposed to talk and to lay on hands.

Discovered New Theme Song: "I'm A Pentecostal"

The Melodians' version of Rivers of Babylon is still the best song in my opinion, but I just discovered I'm A Pentecostal on youtube.com tonight. "We drink till we get merry" has nothing to do with alcohol; we drink in the Spirit of the Living God--Jesus IS His Name--and yeah, that makes us merry and much, much more. There is a drop down in the video's info box. Is that a six-string bass? Wow.

An Opinion: Hobart Freeman's Fatal Flaw, Fallacy, and Failure: Dualism--Faith in a god Who Isn't There

Don't get me wrong -- Hobart Freeman was an exceptional scholar. I wish I had half the Bible knowledge he had. I discovered two of his books in my library, How to Know God's Will and Deeper Life in the Spirit, inherited from my mother many years ago and never read. Read them. Wow. What treatises on faith! This guy is my hero, I think. Oops. Wait. Ninety people died on his watch? Predominantly women in childbirth and children? Himself with gangrene and heart failure? How could faith go so wrong?

Freeman's basic order was find the cross - Calvary - and give up self-life. Then get the baptism of Holy Spirit with evidence of real tongues. Sounds good so far. Then go back to the cross for denial of self-life to walk WITH God. AWK! What? Wait, how can you go back? How, after being resurrected into God’s life, can you walk “with” God as two separate persons? Oh. Duh. Dualism. A separate god. Ignorance of the Truth. No wonder they had problems. They prayed (pray?) to a separate god, a god who is not there. A god who doesn’t exist isn’t going to answer.

Dualism has God as a separate entity, in Its own universe apart from ours. This was an idea inculcated through Freeman's “Christian” education. No concept could be further from the truth: there is no separate god! God is not separate from us. Hobart just never saw that dualism is a lie. Yes, to “die” to self is right, for our sins have separated us from God, but this separation is conceptual—we are not AWARE of God who is NOT separate because of our IGNORANCE from the amnesia we entered when we, spirit OF God, flipped into the consciousness of humanity. Who ascends but He who descended? “Unless you believe, ‘I AM HE,’ you die in your sins.” You just have to read and believe what the Bible actually says.

God is here. Cannot not be. Everything in the universe and beyond is the Ineffable manifest and manifesting. Everything is zero distance to the Ineffable, because it is the Milta. Ourselves are It, also. There is no death except for this ignorance. Yes, once to die into it, and then to grow out of it. We either believe when It says, “You are God" (Psalm 82:6, God = the Ineffable's action, which is IMAGINING), or we get cycled around to try it again. The Ineffable has the time for this.

The reality of this Life is what we are supposed to enter with the baptism of the Holy Spirit and reconciliation with God, which is our becoming conscious of being He. We just don't catch on (see stupid ignorance and "Christian" education above). Still, we do not want to go back to Calvary—that was conviction for not having been conscious and aware and submitted to being Him up till then. Instead, we are to continue on in the resurrection in humility and submission fulfilling the Law in love. We seek the Pearl of Great Price: nothing but Christ, the Milta who appeared at the end of the Season, in Me.

“But Jesus said he hadn’t come to destroy the Law, and he kept it.”

Yes, UNTIL HE DIED. HE DIED. Then he rose. The Law is to get us to that point, then it is done. We died in the Milta, and in It we ROSE reconciled to God. We go on as God. Not asking, but decreeing (not as presumptive, obnoxious, silly jerks). It is called assumption. We assume in faith. We do not believe that God will do it, but that as God we have done it. It being done, the Milta manifests our belief in Its own good time. We do not so assume apart from God, but AS Him--He-Who-We-Are--for we ARE the Milta. This is a cooperative thing. THIS is Israel: God Ruling in Man (Jacob was the inner man). Welcome to the party.

I highly recommend reading Neville Goddard's Resurrection and his other books and lectures. Virtually everything by him is available FREE online, if you look for it, for he left everything in the public domain. Which means everyone is trying to republish it for their profit. Two of my favorite lectures are "God's Law and His Promise,"and "Unless I Go Away."

Might as well introduce you, too, to Gregg Braden, if you do not already know him. What he says of asking in the video I consider to be decreeing. We believe it is done in our thoughts and emotions being made one. Finito complete-o. And here is John 16:23-24 unedited:

"All things that you ask straightly, directly from inside my name, you will be given. So far you have not done this. Ask without hidden motive and be surrounded by your answer. Be enveloped by what you desire, that your gladness be full."

I.e., be enveloped with your desire--be IN it. Feel as if your answer has already happened--you are past it already--be surrounded by it and feel really happy about it. And as Neville says, fall asleep in that state.

Having the Milta, the Manifestation of the Ineffable--the Entirety of It--on the Cross as Our Substitute is a Whole Different Ball of Wax Than the Logos

"For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified" (1 Corinthians 2:2 KJV).

1. And I, my brethren, come to you neither with great speeches, nor with wisdom do I preach to you the sermon of God.
2. And I do not judge myself among you like I know something, except for Jesus Christ, also [Jesus] as he was on the cross.
3. And I come to you with much fear and trembling.
4. And my manifestation and preaching are not through deliverance by words of wisdom, except through the revelation of the Spirit and power.
5. So as your faith may not be in the service of humanity, except through the power of God.
6. Wisdom, however, we speak of among those who are mature, neither the wisdom of this world, nor of the authorities of this world which shall come to naught,
7. Except we speak the wisdom of God through the sermon that was hidden and which God had chosen from before [the foundations of] the universe, for our glorification.
8. That which not one of the authorities of this world know about, for if they know it, they would not have crucified the Lord of Glory.
9. Except as it is written in Scriptures, No eye has seen and no ear has heard, and the human heart has not perceived, that which God has consecrated for those who have mercy on him* (Lit. Ar. idiomatic construction: "Eye does not see and ear does not hear, and over the heart does not rise the thing God graced to those who mercy Him").
10. To us, however, God revealed it through His Spirit, for the Spirit can fathom anything, even the depths of God (1 Corinthians 2:1-10 Alexander).

The Season of Grace transpired and ended. A messiah was cut off, not for himself, and received nothing. Tick, tock; tick, tock; tick, tock. The cut off messiah, it turned out, was the Milta, the Manifestation of the Ineffable, the Most High Infinite and Eternal (..?). EVERYTHING the Ineffable (..?) is--the whole kit and caboodle of the Ineffable--is manifested in the Milta, the eternity (olam, a stripling) God put in our hearts.

The Milta is the DEED of the Ineffable (..?)'s manifestation. There isn't anything of the Ineffable that is left out. It is the act of the Ineffable (..?)'s manifestation from beginning to end: it (everything) is ALL in the Milta. And that completeness of the Ineffable (..?) was our substitute, our extension and representative, on the cross. In It, the Milta, we died. And in It we rose. In It, we ascendED. In the Milta we receive the Holy Spirit and can live as Israel--God-ruled men and women.

All ever done was the Milta. All that will ever be is the Milta. All we need is provided in the Milta. Everything we will ever do is the Milta.

Y'all getting my drift? Some interesting posts:

The Milta / Manifestation of the Eternal God is Your Mind

The Mystery of Miltha Andrew Gabriel Roth

Tag Archives: miltha, February 16, 2016, מֵימְרָא/דָּבַר vs. λόγος

John 1:18 is Opposite of What I Thought ... Maybe

I noticed this blog post (below) while thinking about the consequences of Jesus, our substitute on the cross, being the Milta instead of a logos. Let me put it this way, whatever you think the logos of God is, the Milta is infinitely greater. THAT is a consequence. The translation used in the post appears to be based upon Victor Alexander's, with Vic's, Andrew Roth's, and the author's notes and comments.

The post about the Milta is interesting enough ('Milta' without the 'h' is Alexander's transliteration, and I'm sticking with it), but my interest here is the end of John 1:18: "He who existed in the bosom of his Father, [Who] proclaimed* (spoke of) Him."

Reading it in Young's Literal Translation of the Bible, it would appear that John the Baptist was the one who proclaimed. I change the punctuation, sentence breaks, and emphasis below to show what I mean:

"15 John doth testify concerning him, and hath cried, saying, 'This was he of whom I said, He who after me is coming, hath come before me, for he was before me.' 16 And out of his (the person John the Baptist was talking about) fullness did we all receive, and grace over-against grace; 17 for the law through Moses was given, the grace and the truth through Jesus Christ did come. 18 God no one hath ever seen; the only begotten Son (Jesus), who is on the bosom of the Father -- he (John the Baptist) did declare (about the only begotten Son--Jesus). 19 And this is the testimony of John ..." (John 1:15-19 YLT)

Bullinger in the Companion Bible notes that "he hath declared" is properly translated (from the Greek) as "that one revealed." Using capital letters, though, "That One," Bullinger leaves no doubt as to Who he thinks did the revealing. Looking at the Aramaic, I am not so sure Who revealed Whom. Again, Alexander's translation from the Aramaic is: "No human [being] ever saw Allaha, except for the only born Allaha, He who existed in the bosom of his Father, [Who] proclaimed* Him." According to Bullinger, [Who] in the verse would be "That One." Is that a reference to the Milta proclaiming/revealing the unseen Allaha, or the bosom-host Father proclaiming/revealing his only born Son, the Milta?

And again, the Aramaic Gospel of  Mark, written long before John's, begins, "He reveals the Anointed Life-Giver, Son of Allaha." He who? Happy "Hmm"-ing.

The post:

Miltha

We can’t pass by one of the most notable places (more so than Revelation 19:13) where the occurrence of the Miltha (or “Milta”) appears (it appears in many other places not so easily detected in English Translations), and that is in John Chapter 1. The AONT 2013 is used for reference here.


John 1
1. In the beginning [of creation] there was the Milta*; and that Milta* was with THE MIGHTY ONE; and THE MIGHTY ONE was [the embodiment of] that Milta.*

2. This was in the beginning with THE MIGHTY ONE.

3. Everything was within his power*, [otherwise] nothing would ever exist.*

4. Through him [there] was Life* and Life became the spark* of humanity

5. And that [ensuing] fire* lights the darkness and darkness does not overshadow it.

Textual Notes:

1:1 [all instances] Literal Aramaic word retained: “Manifestation.” “Milta” or “Miltha” is an Aramaic word that has been set aside for only sacred use. Only the Messiah Y’SHUA is ever to be called the Milta. Grammatically, “Milta” means the essential connotation for a person or thing. There is no true English language equivalent for this word.

1:3 Literal Aramaic [Aramaic]: “[In his] hand.”

1:4. 1 “And without his hand, not one [thing that] became would have become.”

1:4. 2 “Lives,” whenever it represents: “life everlasting” is stated in the plural. When used in this sense it will always be capitalized in this translation and appear as “Life.”

1:4. 3 “Light.”

1:5 “Light.”

Verses 13-14:

They who [did not become so] through blood, nor through the desire* of the flesh and neither through a man's willpower*; except they became born [so] from THE MIGHTY ONE. 14. And The Milta became flesh and made his dwelling among us, and we saw His glory, glory as [that] uniquely [of the nature] of the Creator, Full of grace and blessing.

Textual Notes:* 1:13. 1 “Will.”

* 1:13. 2 Literal expression: “Through satisfaction of man [or power of maturity.]”

Verse 18: No human [being] ever saw THE MIGHTY ONE, except for the only born MIGHTY ONE, He who existed in the bosom of his Father, [Who] proclaimed* Him.

Textual Note:

* 1:18 “Spoke of.”

In reference to the Generic Common Term, MIGHTY ONE, can you tell which is which? I can.
_____________________________________________

Another very interesting post on this is:
Tag Archives: miltha
February 16, 2016
מֵימְרָא/דָּבַר vs. λόγος
By Prof. Brian Tice, B.Sci., M.Sci.

This video on the Miltha is interesting, too.

And this on the Nature of Christ

MarYah Meshikha (in the Peshitta)

Genesis 1:1, Exodus 3:14, Mark 1:1, and John 1:1-18: The Question Is The Milta: Are Systematic Theologies Wrong?

We translate the Scriptures and interpret what we think they say (or think they ought to say) according our own preconceived ideas. This has given us a completely invalid concept of what the true metaphysical reality is. What the recorders of the original scriptures meant in their language certainly is not what is coming through in the Greek Septuagint and Greek New Testament. Our trajectory is far worse than a tangent; it's a complete 'tain't.

Our 'tain't began with a bunch of things misread and misunderstood in Genesis 1:1. Our traditional understanding of it is a complete mess. We come to the party with notions of an eternally perfect, self-existent, all-knowing and never changing "I AM BECAUSE I SIMPLY, FROM ALL ETERNITY, AM" (Exodus 3:14) SuperGod. Yet the whole point of creation is that God is changing and is improving from what It was. The ongoing generation of that refinement is our existence. Genesis 1:1 introduces the fact that an uncompleted process is going on.

So when we get to Genesis 1:1, we already have a invalid picture of God in tow. In '"Ehyeh 'asher 'ehyeh" (Ahiyeh Ashur hiyeh in the ancient Aramaic), God was not saying, "I simply am that I am - that is my name;" i.e., that It is uncaused. Moses was searching for God's excellence, jethro. Jethro is a little trippy; it is more like how life works. What are we supposed to do to have a good life? What are the underlying mechanics? What is it that is really going on?

To this God replied, "I am that (your) 'I am' - this process is my nature.” I.e., It, "God," was Moses’ “I am.” It is your “I am,” and It is my “I am.” It is our consciousness, our imagination, our awareness of being existent as "me"--the thing having that perspective in our mind. It is our perspective of self, and by this consciousness/awareness It becomes. That is "His Excellence"--the kingdom (naturally operating power) of God. The Hebrew ehyeh, it is well known, means "will be" or "become." Does "will be" or "become" sound like they mean God is already finished and perfected? They mean God is a work in progress. The kingdom is Its working.

Well, who was working in Genesis 1:1? Let me bring in the idea of Ein Sof. The words are Hebrew for "Without End;" i.e., It is the incomprehensible, infinite Endlessness, The Limitless. Ein Sof is God before any manifestation by or of Itself. Everything that is ... has come from Ein Sof. If you want to know more about Ein Sof, you really have got to read Rabbi David A. Cooper’s God is a Verb: Kabbalah and the Practice of Mystical Judaism (1997, New York: Riverhead Books), pages 66 thru 72.

I am inclined to suggest, however, that the active agent in Genesis 1:1 was the Ineffable No-thing which is beyond Ein Sof. The Ineffable isn't really beyond Ein Sof, of course, It is Ein Sof. Ein Sof is Itself in and of the Ineffable, for it is the Ineffable's ACTION (I'm serious about this verb stuff--all of "God" is forces doing stuff). The Bible says, if we will listen to it, Ein Sof is the Philosophical Child of Its incomprehensible, unimaginable Bigger-Package-Parent, the Ineffable. And Ein Sof is the Milta, which is not the Manifestation of Ein Sof, but of Godhood--the entire Godhead--the Ineffable Itself ... which includes us!

This is important, because Milta is the word used in John 1:1, "In the beginning was the Milta," which parallels Genesis 1:1. Milta is John's great insight--THAT's what he was preaching. The concept of Milta explodes every idea we have had about John's prologue in the first 18 verses of his Gospel. Instead of the Greek word logos, which means word, expression, or meaning, the Aramaic word was Milta--the Manifestation of the entirety of the Ineffable. Logos is an idea, a reflection. Milta is a deed, the whole thing from beginning to end. Our theologies are all screwed up.

Okay. Now we are ready to get down to starting on the first word in Genesis 1:1, which is b'reshith in Hebrew, brasheeth in Aramaic. It is translated into English as a time: "In the beginning." The thing is, it wasn't a time; it was a person. The Beginning--capital 'B'--was the Ineffable intending to become. That act of intention was Its "Son," The Beginning. An intention proceeds before an act. The Ineffable's action was imagining (the only action spirit can take). The Ineffable's imagining is what we call "God." Therefore the Hebrew version of Genesis 1:1 can be translated "By means of (or 'With' or 'As') a Beginning [It (the Ineffable)] created God (Elohim: "Over the Flames," Its action of imagining[!]), the heavens and the earth" (Cooper, pages 66 and 310, note #83, with some of some of Victor Alexander and my take on them both). Per Cooper's note, the Zohar says "By means of a Beginning [It] created Elohim." Elohim was not the person, it was the person's action.

So in the beginning was the Beginning, the "Son," the Manifestation of the entirety of the Ineffable, who created the action which is the imagining of the Ineffable. We call that imagining action Elohim, God the Father; in Aramaic, Allaha. Kind of a different stack-up, isn't it? And still all one Ineffable Being.

This same brasheeth occurs in John 1:1. Let me tweak it: "As the Beginning of creation there was the Milta; and that Milta was with Allaha; and Allaha was [the embodiment of] that Milta" (my melding of Alexander and Cooper/Zohar).See how different this order is? Instead of the "Word" expressing the meaning of God, "God" is the embodiment of the Ineffable's deed--It's Manifestation. THAT MANIFESTATION WAS AND IS "JESUS CHRIST," EASHOA--THE LIFE-GIVING LIVING BRANCH OF THE INEFFABLE.

I close with this possible revelation from Mark 1:1 and John 1:18. The first word in Mark's Gospel, according to Alexander, should be translated "He reveals." The verse is: "He reveals the Anointed Life-Giving, Living Branch." The question that went through my mind when I discovered and wrote about this was, "He who?" Jesus? The Holy Spirit? (The Holy Spirit eliminated due to gender--it is always feminine in Aramaic.) God the Father? A couple of nights ago I looked at John 1:18. The Gospel of John was written many years after Mark. Now, I know from some study that the last Greek word in John 1:18, because there is no object to it, MUST be translated as 'revealed.' "No human being ever saw Allaha, except for the only born Allaha, He who existed in the bosom of his Father, [Who] proclaimed Him" (Alexander).

I DO NOT NOW IF IT IS ALLOWED IN THE GREEK AND ARAMAIC, but I wonder if the verse can be read: "No human being ever saw Allaha (the intention of the Ineffable in action), except for the only born Allaha (the Milta), He (the Milta) who existed in the bosom of his Father (the Ineffable), [Who] proclaimed Him." Who reveals, proclaims the Milta, the Manifestation of the Ineffable which Allaha embodies? THE INEFFABLE! This is all Its doing. So it might not be Jesus, the Milta, revealing God, but God revealing Jesus. The Son is the deed of the Ineffable's manifestation from beginning to end. As such, It incorporates the whole of the Ineffable. The Son alone can thus “see” the Ineffable and still live, because the Son is actually the Ineffable doing it. The Ineffable brought forth Its revelation of Itself at the fullness of time, at the end of the Season of Grace.

PS: Do not be surprised if I come back and do some editing on this.

Minnie Riperton-Rudolph’s Birthday, November 8

Today is Minnie Riperton’s birthday. I usually commemorate July 12th, the day of Minnie’s passing. It was a very sad day. She was a beautiful little girl with a family she was so crazy in love with, and a cancer she could only wait to kill her. Her heartache and her family’s heartache is a big reason I search to understand divine healing.

I have been healed; I know of others who were healed. We can watch T.L. Osborn crusades where hundreds are healed. My mother was an ardent believer, and she died. Why wasn’t Minnie healed? Why wasn’t Mom? What is going on?

We cannot make God heal us, but we can put ourselves where he will: where He is doing. God reminds me through Minnie and Mom that success is not getting what I want, but their healing. There is no success without healing.

To me, Minnie Riperton was just the singer in Rotary Connection. Her passing was an injustice. I do not believe in the Satan character in the Bible and his hoards of demons (though I have met a demon face to face), but I certainly do believe in the ignorance which keeps us from healing the Minnie Ripertons and Moms of the world. THAT force of injustice we have got to overcome.

Today, remember Minnie, remember your “Mom,” and devote your life to healing. Let’s find success.

A Substitute is an Extension

Seth was a substitute for Abel. That means he was a the-same-as. A substitute is the same as what it is a substitute for, or it doesn't work. You cannot substitute rocks for flour. No matter how much yeast you put in, it will not rise. What the original does, the substitute does. If it doesn't, it isn't a legitimate substitute.

Oh, no Dan. Abel was cool. Seth's son was Enosh, weak and sickly. Not cool.

Fascination with Acquisition (Cain) is what kills Abel. That is its "son." Weak and sickly, as Enosh was to Seth. It's a rehash, a parallel, a repeat, dude. As Eve got Seth in place of Abel, the Antediluvian Patriarchs (our attitudes, really) lead us to Noah and the New World. It's a the-same-as. Moses is working on getting the idea over to us that God is relentless in perfecting Itself regardless of the "death" that gets in His way. God is a steamroller of faithfulness (the last chapters of Revelation are already written, so they must HAVE happened).

The Milta (see my last couple of posts) was and is what God embodies. God is showing a picture of the Milta, not the other way around. The Milta is the Big Thing we are in and of. It is our Substitute, an extension of us. BOY(!) that is humbling. What it demonstrated in Jesus Christ is what we really are. In the Milta we were born of a virgin, lived a perfect life, have been condemned unjustly, died on a cross and were buried, raised by God on the third day, and are ascended into heaven and seated in the heavenlies.

Now, was God kidding? I don't think so.

And he told them, "Go to all people and preach my faith in all creation. Whoever believes and declares it, shall Live, and whoever does not believe, will be held accountable. Signs then to those that believe, they who adhere to us, in my name, they will cast out demons, and they will speak in new languages* (tongues), and they will handle snakes* (take up snakes, or deal with evil people), and if deadly poison they drink* (if they drink poison of death, or whatever happens to them), it will not affect them. And they will consecrate their hands on the sick and they will be restored" (Mark 16:15-20 Alexander).

Jesus then the Lord (the Milta!), after he spoke with them, went up to heaven, and sat from the right of God (to sit from the right of God means TO BE THE RIGHT ARM OF GOD*). They then went out, and preached every place, and the Lord helped them and began filling them with signs that they performed.

Wait. Did I just say that we are the right arm of God? Hmmm. Oh, and that as we have the same nature, we thus have the same name.

*Alexander, 2016, Story of Jesus, page 147.

We Might Have It Backwards In That God Embodies The Milta, Not The Milta Embodies God

I cannot imagine anyone in any language not knowing the first verse of John's Gospel in the King James Version (KJV):

"In the beginning was the Word,
And the Word was with God,
And the Word was God."

Doesn't everyone know that? A few might not know that the Greek word for 'Word' is logos. It is pretty clear to see that in the beginning the Word, the logos, was God.

Let's segue over to Vic Alexander's translation from the ancient Aramaic:

"In the beginning [of creation] there was the Manifestation* (Milta Aramaic: the essential connotation for a person or thing);
And that Manifestation (Milta) was with Allaha (God);
and Allaha (God) was [the embodiment of] that Manifestation (Milta)."

Do you see the difference? Logos, the Word, implies embodiment. In the Greek/King James Version, the logos is the embodiment of God. In the Aramaic, it seems to be the exact opposite: what we call God is the embodiment of the Milta. The Milta is the bigger piece of the pie. The whole thing, in fact. And that verb, God, is Its embodiment.

The Milta was The Beginning (brasheeth Aramaic: the Son before beginning). The Ineffable, by imagining, CREATED God (Its actions), the Heavens, and the Earth. And we might have been misreading the Bible up till now.

Milta: Logos Is Not Enough (And Milta Got Me Past The Filipino!)

I finally got past the Filipino. Yahoo! Two weeks after I got saved in Honolulu, Hawaii, I had to go to an office and wait in a long line. Next to me was a Filipino my age reading his pocket Bible. I hadn't been reading mine. It has haunted me for over forty-four years that if he was consistent, that Filipino was ALWAYS two weeks further along in his Bible study than I was. I could never catch up!

But last night I read an old query from Victor Alexander asking why no one had ordered his book Story of Jesus from His Own Words. Victor was looking for advice. Well, I had ordered Story of Jesus and had gone over it with a fine-tooth comb. I'd even sent Vic a list of all the grammatical and typographical errors I could find in it, not realizing he wasn't going to revise it anytime soon. Maybe I was the only one who had ordered it. Not the Filipino! That meant I was finally ahead of him!

I grabbed my copy and wondered why no one else had purchased the book. Well, forty dollars a pop on Amazon was certainly a factor. What promotion was there for it? And a book using quotes from the Bible to explain Jesus isn't all that special or unusual, is it?

I started reading Story of Jesus again. In the Author's Note before the introduction, Alexander explains his point of view. Why his perspective in the book is special. Different. Having read it, I'd say that if I were sitting with Vic in his living room and he asked if I'd pay forty dollars for just this Author's Note, I quickly dig into my pockets to acquire it. Two twenties? Chump change.

The ideas in the Introduction are worth as much or more. I wish Vic had hired a proof-reader before sending it to the publisher: on page 23 he confuses Genesis 17:1, the revelation of the name Eil to Abraham, with Exodus 3:14's, "Ahiyeh Ashur Hiyeh"; and this "burning bush" event (it was Jesus as the sun disc) with the later giving of the Law. THAT kind of confusion is superfluous. We can work through it, right?

I don't blame Victor for this secondary confusion, because the idea of Milta (ܡܠܬܐ - thank you, Dr. J. DeFrancisco) melts your brain, and he was probably in a hurry to share it. In short, Jesus was not the Logos of God, which would be the Word or Expression. He was the Milta: the Manifestation of the entire Godhead. The whole kit-and-caboodle -- not an example or explanation. It is a bigger picture. The Sent and the Sender. Him AND us. He as the substitute for us. Thus when He died, WE died. When He arose, WE arose. It is more consequential than being a messiah. He was a messiah, but He was the Milta who IS our Messiah.

So much. Too much. I am so sorry if I really am the only one who ever bought this book. There is a whole different Christianity here, the real Christianity, that most will never know.

Your Manifestation "Technique" is Your Ritual Propriety

Confucius greatly admired the sage, though he never met one. He read plenty about them, though. THAT was his study. Confucius' The Great Learning was, well, Confucius' great learning from that study. All through The Analects of Confucius, Confucius is concerned with the authoritative person, the sage, and ritual propriety.

The sages Confucius admired were the ancients who had ordered their kingdoms. THAT was Confucius' goal: to order the kingdom. The ancients had done it through ritual propriety. When it came to sacrifice, speech, or relationship with others, the ancients displayed a rectified cultivation of themselves in their behavior. Serious, severe, self-controlled. They used THIS to lead their kingdoms to order rather than threat of punishment for infractions.

Now we are in a kingdom of manifestation. I do not mean for greed's sake. The ancients did it for the love of the people: beneficently. We find that everything without is within (Goddard attributed Blake, though Moses and Jesus taught the same thing). We are the operant power, and to do requires our participation. To cultivate ourselves, to rectify our thought and behavior, is to undertake whatever technique is used with seriousness, severity, and self-control. Sorry, it sounds like I am preaching, but it is observation. If we are going to exercise mind towards manifestation, well, as Jesse Mason used to say, "The only way to do it is to do it."

If we ourselves do not do, nothing contributive is done. Manifesting is not for our looking pretty, but for ordering the kingdom. We do not have to tell anyone. If we are serious and severe, they will see and order themselves aright.

Me is Mystical Moses in My Mind

Jesus ... is mental. Not that there was not really The Dude. The real one only verified the mind one. I.e., the Realized demonstrated what IS. And all recognize Him. But the mind one is real. And is me, inside. In thought.

It is odd to grasp the perspective that we perceive nothing outside of ourselves. Everything that appears without, e.g., those people in the distance, is within me. That life is a fantasy, and that I, truly I, am the operant power. And that I am not me, but God.

No, no. Don't lock me up. I'm ruminating over some of what the Bible says. If you translate the proper names of the biblical characters in Genesis and Exodus, it quickly becomes apparent that they are psychological states and spiritual natures or powers, not people. Not even Cain, The Acquisition; Esau, the human host; or Joseph's trouble in Egypt are necessarily physical. Significant is Jacob's entry into Egypt in the beginning of the Book of Exodus.

Jacob is the inner man, our consciousness (mind, thought, imagination)--the spirit of God. I read the Book of Exodus as being all mental. Jacob, Pharaoh, the midwives, the river, the cages, Moses, Jethro -- ALL of it as being mental. It is all about the mind. Moses is my mind developing and coming to contemplate Jethro, God's excellence. God notices me, I notice God, and God tells me that I am on the right track, marked for ascension, and that He is my doing that (Exodus 3:14 as I read it).

Weird, eh? Dang, if I had a dollar for every way I have translated Exodus 3:14, I could go to Starbucks.

Anyway, is Jacob is our inner man who goes into Egypt, an awareness, with 70 or so facets of our mind. Everything in Egypt is mental, God, for the inner man is God in us, and Jacob is the inner man. Moses is me, and Moses is God. Hence, I am God of the scriptures. I am less concerned that that sounds heretical (though it is what the Bible is saying) than what do I do with it in saving the lost? How do I take this Gospel that they are God to the poor, the homeless, and those in need of healing? Ho'oponopono? Interestingly, when it has been preached unto all the world, then the end will come (Matthew 24:14). Which world? The one out there, or the one in here?

Maybe this isn’t really all that weird. The Ineffable (who is like us who were made in Its image) has an imagination. THE Imagination. EVERYTHING WHICH APPEARS WITHOUT TO THE INEFFABLE ... IS WITHIN IT, too.

Moses in Exodus 3 contacted God within him. The God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (who are also comprehensions of mental states) was his, Moses', mind--the ground he stood upon.

"How do you do?"

"Pretty well, thanks."

"Thanks for dropping by."

"Eh, so like what is going on?"

"You are My becoming."

"Oh."

"Go straighten out your, er, My mind. That will be Me doing that."

"Eh, yeah, right. And so like, how will You be doing that?"

"Your doing it is My doing it (Exodus 3:14 - another dollar for Cafe Mocha). You apply creative thought, and I do it."
______________________________

PS: If this is Ho'oponopono, perhaps the title of this post should be "Me is Mystical Moses, the Messiah in My Mind. Ho'oponopono (as I understand it) is to make right, which is (in a sense) by dying to self and manifesting instead forgiveness IN THE INNER WORLD. The Dude at the end of the Season of Grace mastered this, which messiahed him, and wants to do it again in us now.