God Is Love: It Isn't That God HAS Love; It's That God IS Love
"Do not worship another God, because the Lord's name (nature) is Devoted. For He is the God of Devotion" (Exodus 34:14 Alexander).
Could even the Jews have had it wrong for over three thousand years? That the name Moses gave them for God was never Hebrew or Aramaic, but Proto-Arabic?
From The Torah.com:
An Arabic Name
If YHWH’s origins are in the Nomad-land of Yehwa among the Midianites, then the meaning of the name should be from the Arabic language family rather than the Hebrew language family. This further calls into question the etymology in Exodus 3 of the Tetragrammaton from ה.ו.י, “to be,” since, unlike Hebrew and Aramaic, Proto-Arabic does not have the root ה.ו.י for the word “to be.”
The Jealous God
In 1956, Shelomo Dov Goitein (1900-1985), a scholar of both Jewish and Arabic studies, suggested that the name derives from the Arabic root h.w.y (هوى), and the word hawaya (هوايا), which means “love, affection, passion, desire.” He connected this suggestion with the passage in Exodus 34, in a set of laws known by scholars as the Ritual Decalogue. One of the laws, which forbids Israel to worship other gods, reads:
שמות לד:יד כִּי לֹא תִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה לְאֵל אַחֵר כִּי יְ-הוָה קַנָּא שְׁמוֹ אֵל קַנָּא הוּא. Exodus 34:14 - "For you must not worship any other god, because YHWH, whose name is Impassioned, is an impassioned God."
Goitein suggests that “YHWH, whose name is Impassioned” refers to the deity’s personal name YHWH, which means “the Impassioned One,” and that this name derives from that (proto)Arabic term for passion. This reflects the idea that YHWH’s bond with his worshipers is one of passionate love, and YHWH is upset if the worshipers “cheat” by worshipping other gods. In other words, the worshippers’ relationship with YHWH must be exclusive. Moreover, according to Goitein, this exclusivity demanded by YHWH goes back to his appearance as a god among nomadic, Arabian tribes. (Bold emphases mine)
_________________________________________
So we are speaking of a monolatrous (see the article), impassioned religion - ages older than Judaism - which was devoted to The Impassioned God. And it, God's love, has been running right through Judaism and Christianity as if oblivious to the fact that we have got its name all wrong. It hasn't been hidden: if we can't read, that's our problem.
We read about God's agape love, that love is of God, chesed - election love, the more excellent way, that love is the fulfillment of the Law, "For God so loved the world," that Jesus died for the whole world. That God deserves our love is one thing; that God is our love is quite another. We are to diligently seek Him by loving, by being channels of His passion.
Speaking of reading, Moses' father-in-law Reuel means "God-looked-upon." Jethro means "His overflowing super-abundance." Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob knew God as Eil (the) Shaddai, the All-providing Breasts, but not as the Impassioned One. And grammatically YHWH Elohim means "His Love (or Passion) is the Universal God."
(Edit added 3-9-2023: per Victor Alexander, Elohim means "Over the Flames." I was going to say right now that "Flames" could be the stars of the universe, ourselves, or the spirits of God within us. But I suddenly wonder if they could be His loves, i.e., those whom He loves, those for whom He is blazingly impassioned.)
1 Comments:
People say that God is love. They have no idea just how untrue this is!
People say that we should all unite in peace. But their definition of unity and peace leaves out both God and those who fear Him.
The secular, the arrogant and the fool, they all belong together and deserve one another.
Hi Dan, The above post is part of a post on a Kabbalistic Facebook group I am in. I read it the day before you posted your "God is Love" piece, I thought the timing was wonderful. I commented on the post stating that someone else had a different view and I shared the article from Torah.com. I am not on the scholarly level of understanding so could not counter the argument given back but I enjoy the different points of view. I love your last few posts, they are a truly beautiful interpretation of your study of scripture. I like your interpretation better, the author of the paper seemed less arrogant than the person who said "God is not love." But I am reminded what Neville said once in a lecture that one could spend a lifetime studying the Bible and never understand all its symbolism. I think perhaps we see where we are at in our own heart reflected back to us in what we read and understand. I like the Kabbalistic perspective on the Bible but it gets way too complicated for my mind. That is another reason I resonated with Neville. I was listening to his lecture "What Is Man?" and I was reminded that we need not do anything to be initiated to find Him, it is an experience. I don't need to know the right people, eat the right food, or anything like that. I am worthy as I am. It is His timing, I know too. I wait with excited expectation.
Thank you for sharing such beautiful insights. Your take on Moses seeing the burning thorn bush being his own life makes so much sense and makes it so much more relatable to the "everyman." It is humbling.
Take care Dan. Have a good day!
By ccraig, at 5:01 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home