Help Make a Movie: The Dualistic Christ vs the Nondual Christ, or the Modern First(!) Advent of Eashoa?

I would seriously like to receive some help (see below). Victor Alexander has had a life-long dream of making a movie about the real Jesus Christ, the story of Eashoa Msheekha of the ancient Aramaic Bible. His movie would correct many of the doctrinal errors of Western Christianity.

Mr. Alexander has put forth this scenario proposal: "What if Jesus had come to the world for the first time today? How would we be different from the Jews, the Greeks and the Romans of two thousand years ago? And who would be the Aramaic speaking people of today? It would make a really interesting movie, wouldn't it? Would you support such a movie project? Let me know what you think."

The Life-giving Branch born into the world for the first time NOW. I think the existing church with its expectation of His immanent return would muck it up a bit. Kind of like Carter on Mars; it would be an already discarded thesis.

What if the reading of the Bible by the church is screwy, though, and Jesus Christ, as Paul suggests, ever has been the Power of God and the Wisdom of God which incarnates in each and every child born of woman, as the child, but without his knowing it (else Life could not incarnate to suffering)? I would rather have a movie that pits the teachings of the non-dual, subtle inner man, the consciousness and imagination of every man and woman, that is the incarnation of Jesus Christ crucified at birth to become us. . . against the church's teaching of the dualistic Jesus Christ who came and died, arose and is coming again in judgment.

I would contrast the emptiness and desperation of the Christ-is-up-in-Heaven church participants with the confidence of Christ-became-me church participants, with the latter participants speaking on behalf of Christ in them. But I am not making the movie, Victor Alexander is.

I do not have an extra hundred thousand dollars to invest in Victor's movie. Many of you do. For you a quarter of a million is chump change. If you would like to hear what Mr. Alexander would really like to do to present the accurate picture of Jesus Christ from the ancient Aramaic Bible of the Church of the East, please contact him at http://www.v-a.com/bible/ (vic@v-a.com)


The help I would like to receive is how to say this better: "It is strange and sad to me that the subtle, inner man, the consciousness and imagination of every man and woman which is Christ, is considered heresy by the church." I am sure there is a better way to say it. Would you mind to take a poke at saying it better in the comments section below? Thanks.