The Becoming God

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Neville Goddard's Shouted Secret: Love Imagined Bloodly

You can imagine light. It is a wonderful thinking to imagine light. We might liken such casual thinking/imagining of light to water. But if one can imagine light to its BECOMING light, that is "blood." We are saved by the blood of Christ, Who we are, if we imagine what we imagine to its BECOMING. THAT is basic Bible 101. Neville's much shouted secret was, "IT'S GOT TO BE LOVE!!" All God does is LOVE IMAGINED; Its Own becoming.

posted by Daniel C. Branham-Steele at 5:46 PM

8 Comments:

  • Was it Luciferian doctrine that Neville taught? Same as Blavasky, Crowley, etc. Luciferian doctrine that tells man he is God?

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:29 PM  

  • Dear 4:29,

    Thank you for writing and calling my attention back to this post. I rewrote it to make it a bit clearer, I hope. Your question kind of threw me for a loop. Where in Luciferian doctrine does it suggest that man is God? Nowhere I know of. It is quite the opposite, isn't it? You are probably confused because Neville taught NON-DUALISM, that everything, God and Creation included, is the same One Consciousness of the Ineffable Source. The differentiations within the One Consciousness are what is done with that consciousness. What I am saying in my post is that we can imagine on a water level or on a blood level. Both are consciousness. One is wishful thinking, the other creative, causing life.

    This might be a little hard to wrestle with, but great lie is that we are SEPARATE from God, that He is "Wholly other." There isn't anything that is wholly other than the Ineffable. It has expanded to become ALL. The Ineffable Most High IS the ex-nihilo--the No-thing--It made everything out of. Our oneness with It is hidden by our ignorance, the ILLUSION of separateness we got in the amnesia of being born here. It is Luciferic doctrine that we are separate from God. Oh, wait, isn't that also your church's doctrine? It certainly is not Jesus'.

    By Blogger Daniel C. Branham-Steele, at 12:03 AM  

  • Thank you for the reply. I'll tell you what is behind my question. It has occurred to me, more than once, that practicing what Neville taught might actually be akin to witchcraft, magick, etc.... things generally perceived as bad/evil. And I'm not willing to sell my soul in order to manifest material gains (which would make life easier and more enjoyable).

    That could be the religious fear mongering I was raised in talking. The thing is, how do we ever really know? Yes I could Neville's thesis to the test as he challenged and prove that Imgination works to manifest things, but that doesn't prove it's not an evil/forbidden practice...

    "Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ" 2 Corinthians 10:5 (Would be great if you did a post on this verse)

    I always come to you with these questions because I know you know the Bible well. And with all that's going on in the world right now with the virus, and the many "conspiracy" theories (which you may not be aware of) regarding "deep state" and "Illuminati" and "the cabal" and "secret societies" and eugenics and NWO etc etc etc, it makes me wonder if manifestation a la Neville is a dark art.

    I do tend to doubt his story about a black rabbi from Ethiopia. His teaching to me seems to be a portion of Kabbalah, but he left some of it out. His teaching seems to align with Blavatsky who declared "Lucifer is the only god of this world" and who also inspired Crowley. Bottom line is I don't want to be unknowingly practicing a dark art. It's not worth my soul.

    Thank you and I hope you reply further :)










    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 8:34 AM  

  • 8:34,

    I really appreciate your question, because I have been working on the topic about a week already. Wasn't sure how to address it, what was my focus, etc.. During this Covid-19 shutdown I have been watching some of the Law of Attraction teachers (and a lot of its wannabes) AND videos from Supreme Yogi (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCytQ5_IeFYxSpTmUhk2h8HQ). The LOA is so repulsive to me. "Look what I've got! Cars, big house, jewelry, Watches!, yacht, a luxurious life--and I owe it all to my frequency! YOU COULD HAVE ALL THIS, TOO!!" Do I smell a rat here?

    I smell bricks. Bricks are self-made stones. I smell entrapment, the construction of prison cities, like the children of Israel in Egypt. They are serving the god of this world--their own ignorance. The LOA tells you, demonstrates that God is there. Here. But they don't get it--they've got sparkles in their eyes: "I did it." Not good, Nebuchadnezzar.

    Neville was more like the Hindu masters. I am not pro hindu religion, but pro the ancient philosophy. Okay, LOA works. By what, why, and how is it working? By God. What is of worth to pursue, then, your life of ease, or God? LOA demonstrates that God is good, is giving, that Eil Shaddai is the All-providing Breasts. If He--the Divine Mother--is giving, why are you worried about getting? Make your petition KNOWN (like knowing - assuming - that you have it) before God, delight also in Him, and HE will bring it to pass (Psalm 37). That is not selling your soul; that's OBEDIENCE expecting the nature of God, the Kingdom, to be true. Neville beat us over the head with, "Do nothing out of the norm to accomplish it yourself. Trust God!!" THEN HE SAT DOWN, AND PURSUED GOD. Modern religious techniques -- no. Perceiving God and loving God -- yes.

    I will have more in an upcoming post.

    By Blogger Daniel C. Branham-Steele, at 3:34 PM  

  • Well, you said you hoped I'd respond further:

    https://imagicworldview.blogspot.com/2020/05/a-continued-continued-response-to.html

    By Blogger Daniel C. Branham-Steele, at 2:58 PM  

  • Not pro hindu religion but pro philosophy...? What if I said that about your Christianity

    By Blogger Neuromantic*, at 8:27 PM  

  • Let's say it together: "Not pro Christian or Hindu nor any other religion, but pro the ancient philosophy, which was imagining illusion into reality in love."

    By Blogger Daniel C. Branham-Steele, at 2:33 PM  

  • Gotcha.

    By Blogger Neuromantic*, at 7:43 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home