Evidence: God Personally DOES Something That Proves That He Is...

(Siti's response...)

...when you begin to feel a little “spooky” because it’s you...in Him, and you begin to understand who you really are.
___________________________

(I was going to continue...)

...in response to a human assumption.

So, what is it evidence of? One, that He is there and that He is powerful. Two, that the assumption is known by Him.

Neil Tyson as a scientist might object: "No, it does not prove that there is a third party. The something done would not necessarily be a response to our assumption, but rather an extension of it. It is agreed that we in our assuming are the initiating stimulus for what results. The causal relationship does nor require a separate actor, but would be in-house, as it were--an inherent outcome. We assume, and that by and of itself is the power causing the resultant something we perceive as a "response."

Exactamundo, Mister Tyson (if you had said it). By the evidence we discover that "God" is our own, wonderful, HUMAN imagination. For we, and everything else, are one. "God" is not a separate actor who responds to our assumptive stimuli. It is the Power our consciousnesses are of. We are Its conscii. He is who--It is what--we really are. God is not in us like an egg is in a chicken; He is "in" us because He has become us. We are all one whole. That fact is sitting in the Gap, and it is worthy of investigation.

The evidence of witnesses is their experience.