Genesis 1:26, Why Everyone But Victor Alexander Has It Wrong

Edit: I should qualify the perspective below. I believe that over a great period of time the unknowable and ineffable No-thing discovered and developed Its own consciousness and powers. The Ineffable's "manifestation" was and is that consciousness. Therefore Consciousness is Its "Son," and that Consciousness's activity is "God." By Its Consciousness the Ineffable created (imagined) the earth and man on it. By 'created' I mean imagined; I do not mean made physical. Then, somewhere along the line...

The Ineffable Being, having imagined man upon the earth, imagined and thoroughly determined what Its full and complete, fully functioning manifestation would be as a man. What would be the Perfect Individual, the End of the Ineffable's becoming a man? Indeed, what would the Ineffable BE as a man? The Ineffable manifested as the Perfect Man would be the Ineffable's whole essence, the complete expression of Its impassioned Self, Its "Word"; i.e., an individual the epitome of Love and Dominion.

The Perfect Man would not be adjacent to the Ineffable -- the Man would actually BE the Ineffable, as It would actually be the Ineffable's individualized consciousness. And the imagined man BECAME. Or rather, the Ineffable in Its consciousness BECAME the Man, the Milta (Aramaic). The Milta exists as God perfectly, fully, completely manifested. They - the two of Them - are one party. One is Spirit, the Consciousness Over the Flames; the other is a man who is God Almighty, Eil the Shaddai, the Impassioned One, all with no division.

I have been looking through my study Bibles and commentaries for this perspective, and no one else seems to get that God (the Consciousness) said to Its Manifestation's Devoted End-Man, the Milta, "Let Us make man in OUR image." The Milta/Man was already the Image of God and WAS God, but the ignorant naked primate men and women on the earth were not yet in their image, did not have their characteristics. Every last commentary text I have (admittedly, I have given many away) says that God spoke either to the rest of the Trinity or to Its hosts of ministering angels as "us." Even to Its "reflected plural of majesty." To my recollection, NO ONE EXCEPT VICTOR ALEXANDER HAS SAID THAT GOD WAS SPEAKING TO ITS OWN MANIFESTATION, THE MILTA. It was this Milta who was the "Beginning" in Genesis 1:1 -- "AS the Beginning (the Creator), the Son of God (the Ineffable's Milta) creates the heavens and the earth" (Alexander, emphasis and parentheses mine). Note that Its creating is ongoing.

Only Victor Alexander, as far as I can determine, has noted that the Milta spoken about in John 1:1, "In the Beginning of creation, there was the Manifestation...This (Manifestation) was with God...Everything was within his power, otherwise nothing would ever exist," was the Perfect Man THROUGH WHOM, WITH WHOM, BY WHOM God created the world: "And the earth was for Him and by Him" (Genesis 1:2 Alexander). And that this Original Man, the Milta, was born, lived, tried, scourged and crucified, died and was buried for us as the Perfect Love and Perfect Sacrifice at the end of the Season of Grace. The Milta, Eashoa (Aramaic, the Life-giver - Jesus), was what the Season of Grace was all about. He is what the Ancient Aramaic Church was (and is) all about. And He wasn't the Trinity, nor the hosts of heaven. He was the guy we call Jesus -- God Almighty incarnate, the Ineffable’s Perfect Manifestation.

Personally, I am very glad the Man did not stay dead, but rose from the grave to ascend to where He was, because now I am one with Him there, here, eternally. How about you?