Heading For Healing 17: On Conscii: All the Gods are One -- Here, There, and Everywhere
I received a question from Anonymous on my response to AmberLC:
"Dan, thank you for the reply. I have long struggled with the 'I Am God' part of Neville, and visited your blog many times, looking for clarification. How is God different from 'God the Sent'? and how does this idea of there being a giver and receiver apply to it? DO NOT MISREAD IN MARK 11:24 THE WORD 'RECEIVE,' FOR WE RECEIVE FROM GOD."
By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:19 AM
______________________________________
Dear Anonymous Anonymous,
How is God different from God the Sent? I want to take you on a little mind trip. First of all, you should get a copy of the book by J. B. Phillips or make a plaque you can prominently display where you will always see it which says, "YOUR GOD IS TOO SMALL" (1961 New York: The Macmillan Company). I am not insulting you; we all have too small of a God. Take this consideration with you into your shower or bath: "What is God?" Be ready to be informed by the Big Guy.
The Big Guy
It is fairly certain our portion of the universe is about 13.7 billion years old. I say our portion because time-space is expanding so rapidly that the furthest galaxies in the observable universe are falling out of sight, as they become too far away for their light to ever reach the earth. You probably missed that. Not only is the universe expanding in space, the space the universe is in is expanding as well. The portion we can see -- from Deep Field observation this way to Deep Field observation that way -- might be but an infinitesimal speck in the overall mass of universes. We have hundreds of billions of galaxies in our neighborhood, each with trillions of stars, and trillions of trillions of planets. Infinity is a BIG place.
Now for the trip. In your mind, eliminate it all. Wipe out our universe. Wipe out all the stars. Wipe any other universes, and even all the empty space the universes were in. Blank out all forms of existence. There is no light. Creation and Creator are gone. You probably still imagine an empty endlessness. Eliminate that, also. Not only is everything blank, the blank is gone, too. Could this be done, there would still be a consciousness, the Ein Sof, the Endlessness from which the endless infinity we just eliminated came from. I am not interested in that. Eliminate the Divine Consciousness, too. There is no thought or imagination.
What is left isn't nothing; it is the No-thing, the ineffable (..?). I honestly haven't even a clue as to what That, the Ineffable, might be. I envision It as being like an infinite electromagnetic field or the field of gravity WITHOUT electromagnetism or gravity. It is a power with the potential for consciousness. THIS is the "Big Guy." It is a infinite, invisible, thing-less, ineffable, actionless, non-mass. And It is the cause of everything else because It did attain consciousness. It imagined and became aware of Its own existence.
In my mind, the Big Guy existed as a non-conscious field for a really long time before It became aware. The Ineffable's consciousness, Its awareness of itself, was the first "thing," Its Manifestation. The Ineffable's Imagination is Its only Manifestation. The imagining Consciousness might weirdly have been non-local, an awareness as high, as wide, as long, and as deep as the field Itself. Maybe it still is.
THAT, to me, the Big Guy -- the non-thinking, non-acting Power Who now thinks and acts -- is "God." Note: the Ineffable's action is eternally limited to imagination. It is now Infinite Intelligence. For the Ineffable thought and thought and found out -- self-discovery time -- all that It was, all the powers that It had, and all that It wasn't.
"Wait. What? What do you mean, 'that It wasn't'?" the Ineffable thought to Itself. "What else could I be? How else could I be? I don't like missing stuff, especially if it is Me. Missing ain't right, and I am right." It thought through all that It could be. It thought through, I believe, everything that would or could happen for It to become RIGHT with nothing missing. It thought through every way It could exist as right, everything that could go wrong, everything that would remedy, every need, every provision, every way anything could happen, everything it would take to become right. The Ineffable thought through to the end of Revelation for all the universes before there was any universe.
Remember Abarim-Publications.com, who gave us: "compartmentalization: to break some continuum apart into separated elements." This is a key concept. Everything in the continuum from Big Guy to the end of Revelation would exist as transitory states. All would be the Big Guy going there, becoming complete. "Hey, wait what will be a minute when time exists," the Ineffable thought. "I'm thinking all this stuff, and I've got a bunch of sunflowers — conscii — the height, length, depth, and breadth of Me who aren't getting it. It's like they are stuck in the mud or something. For Me to be complete, they need to be like Me: RIGHT: free, moral, loving, and powerful. What's a Mother to do?" (The Big Guy isn't really a guy.)
The Milta (Alexander. It is everywhere else 'Miltha,' and I wonder if it wouldn't be pronounced 'milt-ha')
Consciousness as the Big Guy's manifestation wasn't all that It could be. It, the Consciousness, needed to be manifest in all those other ways. For the Ineffable Big Guy to actually be manifest in them, they needed to become HIM!! It's self-discovery, right? The Ineffable would become them, and then they would become Him by having His nature inculcated and generated in them. The Ineffable had been an infinite, invisible, thing-less, actionless, ignorant non-mass. It had attained consciousness, and was now a Power Who thought and acted by the conscience's IMAGINATION. His manifestation would have to follow suit.
I am familiar with a half dozen words or so of Aramaic, but not to so well as to explain them. 'Milta' is an especially challenging concept. Victor Alexander's note on John 1:1, where the Greek uses Logos, says "'Milta,' ... the essential connotation for a person or thing. There is no true English equivalent for this concept." I'll throw this in, too:
"Translator of the Aramaic Bible Translation Project, Victor N. Alexander, explains his translation of Matthew 15:6 in the Syriac translation of the P'shitta:
"I opened up John and started reading the ancient Aramaic of this Gospel for the first time, and I was awed by it. Here was a clear view of the Triune God, from the very beginning of the first chapter. The key word was 'Milta,' a beautiful word in its theological connotation. 'Logos' and 'Word' are such poor substitutes. There is essentially no English translation for the word 'Milta' in a theological sense. Therefore, I had to come up with one. I have translated the word 'Milta' as 'Manifestation.' Jesus Christ is God Manifest. There is one God. There are three Manifestations, the Father and the Son and the holy Spirit."
I am going to suggest here that the Milta is the Ineffable’s Consciousness. The Big Guy, as it were, lie down to sleep, and dreamed He was I. Ignorant, lame-brained, stupid me. This was the fall of man and the crucifixion and the Beginning of all fractured existence. The Milta is conscious of all the Big Guy AND the sleep states. It is Him AND His manifestation. It is God (the only God we will ever know, by the way), and it is sent into this darkness of ignorance without reservation (except it still knows what it is). It is God’s Consciousness which is “Jesus Christ.” It was the Consciousness which was the Anointing upon the Jew who believed and dared in faith to die at the end of the Season of Grace. That act initiated this New Age of Faith Rehnborg wrote of.
What has all this to do with receiving in Mark 11:24? We are a cooperative one. We are God’s Consciousness ignoranced becoming Him. We are becoming unignoranced. We ASSUME, as He does, that we HAVE what we desire, and we allow Him to bring it to pass. His bringing it into experiential manifestation is His part. We are free within the perimeters of His nature to desire whatever we will and assume that that state is received. If we so dream it, He dreams it, for we are one: God the Big Guy, and God the Sent. The Jewish guy did a real good job of getting unignoranced. We should do as well in having a BIG God. BIGGER. BIGGER.
"Dan, thank you for the reply. I have long struggled with the 'I Am God' part of Neville, and visited your blog many times, looking for clarification. How is God different from 'God the Sent'? and how does this idea of there being a giver and receiver apply to it? DO NOT MISREAD IN MARK 11:24 THE WORD 'RECEIVE,' FOR WE RECEIVE FROM GOD."
By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:19 AM
______________________________________
Dear Anonymous Anonymous,
How is God different from God the Sent? I want to take you on a little mind trip. First of all, you should get a copy of the book by J. B. Phillips or make a plaque you can prominently display where you will always see it which says, "YOUR GOD IS TOO SMALL" (1961 New York: The Macmillan Company). I am not insulting you; we all have too small of a God. Take this consideration with you into your shower or bath: "What is God?" Be ready to be informed by the Big Guy.
The Big Guy
It is fairly certain our portion of the universe is about 13.7 billion years old. I say our portion because time-space is expanding so rapidly that the furthest galaxies in the observable universe are falling out of sight, as they become too far away for their light to ever reach the earth. You probably missed that. Not only is the universe expanding in space, the space the universe is in is expanding as well. The portion we can see -- from Deep Field observation this way to Deep Field observation that way -- might be but an infinitesimal speck in the overall mass of universes. We have hundreds of billions of galaxies in our neighborhood, each with trillions of stars, and trillions of trillions of planets. Infinity is a BIG place.
Now for the trip. In your mind, eliminate it all. Wipe out our universe. Wipe out all the stars. Wipe any other universes, and even all the empty space the universes were in. Blank out all forms of existence. There is no light. Creation and Creator are gone. You probably still imagine an empty endlessness. Eliminate that, also. Not only is everything blank, the blank is gone, too. Could this be done, there would still be a consciousness, the Ein Sof, the Endlessness from which the endless infinity we just eliminated came from. I am not interested in that. Eliminate the Divine Consciousness, too. There is no thought or imagination.
What is left isn't nothing; it is the No-thing, the ineffable (..?). I honestly haven't even a clue as to what That, the Ineffable, might be. I envision It as being like an infinite electromagnetic field or the field of gravity WITHOUT electromagnetism or gravity. It is a power with the potential for consciousness. THIS is the "Big Guy." It is a infinite, invisible, thing-less, ineffable, actionless, non-mass. And It is the cause of everything else because It did attain consciousness. It imagined and became aware of Its own existence.
In my mind, the Big Guy existed as a non-conscious field for a really long time before It became aware. The Ineffable's consciousness, Its awareness of itself, was the first "thing," Its Manifestation. The Ineffable's Imagination is Its only Manifestation. The imagining Consciousness might weirdly have been non-local, an awareness as high, as wide, as long, and as deep as the field Itself. Maybe it still is.
THAT, to me, the Big Guy -- the non-thinking, non-acting Power Who now thinks and acts -- is "God." Note: the Ineffable's action is eternally limited to imagination. It is now Infinite Intelligence. For the Ineffable thought and thought and found out -- self-discovery time -- all that It was, all the powers that It had, and all that It wasn't.
"Wait. What? What do you mean, 'that It wasn't'?" the Ineffable thought to Itself. "What else could I be? How else could I be? I don't like missing stuff, especially if it is Me. Missing ain't right, and I am right." It thought through all that It could be. It thought through, I believe, everything that would or could happen for It to become RIGHT with nothing missing. It thought through every way It could exist as right, everything that could go wrong, everything that would remedy, every need, every provision, every way anything could happen, everything it would take to become right. The Ineffable thought through to the end of Revelation for all the universes before there was any universe.
Remember Abarim-Publications.com, who gave us: "compartmentalization: to break some continuum apart into separated elements." This is a key concept. Everything in the continuum from Big Guy to the end of Revelation would exist as transitory states. All would be the Big Guy going there, becoming complete. "Hey, wait what will be a minute when time exists," the Ineffable thought. "I'm thinking all this stuff, and I've got a bunch of sunflowers — conscii — the height, length, depth, and breadth of Me who aren't getting it. It's like they are stuck in the mud or something. For Me to be complete, they need to be like Me: RIGHT: free, moral, loving, and powerful. What's a Mother to do?" (The Big Guy isn't really a guy.)
The Milta (Alexander. It is everywhere else 'Miltha,' and I wonder if it wouldn't be pronounced 'milt-ha')
Consciousness as the Big Guy's manifestation wasn't all that It could be. It, the Consciousness, needed to be manifest in all those other ways. For the Ineffable Big Guy to actually be manifest in them, they needed to become HIM!! It's self-discovery, right? The Ineffable would become them, and then they would become Him by having His nature inculcated and generated in them. The Ineffable had been an infinite, invisible, thing-less, actionless, ignorant non-mass. It had attained consciousness, and was now a Power Who thought and acted by the conscience's IMAGINATION. His manifestation would have to follow suit.
I am familiar with a half dozen words or so of Aramaic, but not to so well as to explain them. 'Milta' is an especially challenging concept. Victor Alexander's note on John 1:1, where the Greek uses Logos, says "'Milta,' ... the essential connotation for a person or thing. There is no true English equivalent for this concept." I'll throw this in, too:
"Translator of the Aramaic Bible Translation Project, Victor N. Alexander, explains his translation of Matthew 15:6 in the Syriac translation of the P'shitta:
"I opened up John and started reading the ancient Aramaic of this Gospel for the first time, and I was awed by it. Here was a clear view of the Triune God, from the very beginning of the first chapter. The key word was 'Milta,' a beautiful word in its theological connotation. 'Logos' and 'Word' are such poor substitutes. There is essentially no English translation for the word 'Milta' in a theological sense. Therefore, I had to come up with one. I have translated the word 'Milta' as 'Manifestation.' Jesus Christ is God Manifest. There is one God. There are three Manifestations, the Father and the Son and the holy Spirit."
I am going to suggest here that the Milta is the Ineffable’s Consciousness. The Big Guy, as it were, lie down to sleep, and dreamed He was I. Ignorant, lame-brained, stupid me. This was the fall of man and the crucifixion and the Beginning of all fractured existence. The Milta is conscious of all the Big Guy AND the sleep states. It is Him AND His manifestation. It is God (the only God we will ever know, by the way), and it is sent into this darkness of ignorance without reservation (except it still knows what it is). It is God’s Consciousness which is “Jesus Christ.” It was the Consciousness which was the Anointing upon the Jew who believed and dared in faith to die at the end of the Season of Grace. That act initiated this New Age of Faith Rehnborg wrote of.
What has all this to do with receiving in Mark 11:24? We are a cooperative one. We are God’s Consciousness ignoranced becoming Him. We are becoming unignoranced. We ASSUME, as He does, that we HAVE what we desire, and we allow Him to bring it to pass. His bringing it into experiential manifestation is His part. We are free within the perimeters of His nature to desire whatever we will and assume that that state is received. If we so dream it, He dreams it, for we are one: God the Big Guy, and God the Sent. The Jewish guy did a real good job of getting unignoranced. We should do as well in having a BIG God. BIGGER. BIGGER.
posted by Daniel C. Branham-Steele at
4:07 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home