"I
entirely disagree with everything here. It sounds like you've elevated
yourself to God and have fallen for the same lie as the snake lured
Eve in the Garden of Eden, “You will be 'like' God knowing Good and
Evil”...it's the same trap many who are into psychology fall into.
Beware. In doing so, the cross has been eliminated: “It is not I who
lives but Christ.” It is not my life to Live but rather
being Alive in the Life of Christ to be shaped and molded into His
image, not to shape and mold myself into His by my imagination..."
Stephen,
I appreciate
everything you said above in your comment on my post, How to Think Right Biblically. I am more aligned with your thinking than you may
think (you do, in fact, sound exactly like me
not too long ago). I am hoping that you will not write me off just yet.
You see, I would like to try a little experiment, because I am facing
an enormous challenge, and you can help me by just listening.
I find that I write
better in correspondence explaining the things I have
learned to a live person. I see from your comment that you are very typical and
representative of my target audience (me, actually),
and I would like to write to you. I will address you as a general “you”
typical of other Christians.
The challenge I face
is quite Biblical, and it involves you whether you like it or not. I
believe I have found a better, more mature and practical way to think of
and relate to God. Not another God, not a
foreign God, just the God of the Bible. It is to understand and operate
in the spiritual life of the True God
by another perspective than we typically do as Christians. Nothing occult or voodooy, just a more Biblical perspective.
The trouble I face
is trying to get this more Biblical perspective out and “over-to” the
audience before getting cut off by their doctrinal prejudices. We tend to
cut-off anything that challenges what we “know.” We do not seem to have much faith in the ability of God to keep us.
I ask you to
consider this passage you know well: “How then shall they call upon Him
in Whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of
Whom they have not heard?” (Romans 10: 14). This is
my question and meditation: If I cannot call upon a God I have not
heard of, have I heard of and believed on the True God of the Bible?
My answer is,
“Probably not.” Why not? Because the people who have been telling us of
Him have never heard of Him, either. No, in all Biblical honesty, they have heard, but they deny him because the True God doesn't fit their theology. How could they possibly preach the
True God except they be sent BY Him? They can’t
be sent by Him unless they know Him, and they cannot possibly truly know Him
if they have not had the experience of his revelation.
Yes, we have the
Bible, and the preachers know it, and we know the Bible, too. But what
if we know the Bible amiss? You do not have to be much of a Greek or
Hebrew scholar to know that what we read in our
English translations is not what it says in Greek, Hebrew or Aramaic.
We have shelves full of study
Bibles, commentaries and lexicons which we dig through constantly trying
to fathom what the Bible’s authors were trying
to tell us. We pride ourselves on knowing and being able to share what
a verse's words actually
mean.
We study the ancient
manners and customs of the Biblical peoples. Some analyze their
philosophies—the mind-sets of the ancient peoples. What we have been told that the ancient
peoples believed is NOT what they actually believed, and the actual
history of the Bible lands was not anything like what we have been
taught. Our common understanding is simplistic, truncated,
and almost wholly errant.
Something else was going on. A
lot of other things were going on. The ancient people were
a lot more dynamic than we have thought. People and their ideas were
constantly moving about, influencing others. The whole area was heavy
with philosophers arguing their points of view. I think
it was three places in the Dead Sea scrolls I found reference to the
Book of Meditation—from which fathers were admonished to begin teaching
their sons from at least the age seven. My daddy didn’t teach me how to
meditate, but it was their expectation.
Ethelbert Bullinger in The Companion Bible discusses how the Bible—correct that—the ancient
scrolls have been changed, by whom and why. There seems to have been some evolution within the scriptures. Having
learned some of the breadth of possible meanings in the Hebrew and
Aramaic languages, I started taking a wider view of
what the whole was saying. More importantly, I learned some of how the
ancient mystics thought, how they taught, and the meanings of relevant
ancient myths.
Ancient history,
philosophy, and psychology. Why bother studying all that stuff? Because
some time after being baptized in the Holy Spirit, I saw Jesus scourged
and crucified, and he spoke to me. He looked
right at me and said, “Come unto Me.” Audibly, but directly into the
brain’s nervous system, not through the ears. Cool trick. I wanted to
know what else he had
said to men. Not what people think about him, not what they think the scriptures mean, but what he said and what he
meant by what he said.
This started in
April of 1975, when I was a just 25 years old. I went to a Charismatic
seminary (Melodyland School of Theology) where without day one of
college prep or junior college—I just barely graduated
high school—they put me in upper division theology classes. I suddenly
had to read like hell, study and analyze and compose theme papers. But I
learned how to READ. I have been through a number of universities, and
one thing I have become certain about over
the years is this: what we read in the Bible, as “we” read it, is NOT
what the authors meant.
We misread the
scriptures. This is why I know that we do not worship the God of the
Bible as he is to be worshiped: we do not know him, at least, not as he
should be known.